Clinical Evidence

Published clinical data supporting the use of Mazor Robotics technology in spine surgery.

clincial evidence on mazor technology
 

Patient Outcomes

Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. 1
Compared to open, conventional procedures, patients that underwent spine surgery with Mazor Robotics technology had:

 

 

 

Accuracy

 

 

Fluoroscopy

 

Footnotes

  1. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, Burger R, Giese A, Rhode V. Perioperrative Course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):860-868.

  2. Hu X, Ohnmeiss D, Liberman, I. Robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement; Lessons learned from the first 102 patients. Eur Spine J.2013;22:661-666

  3. Devito DP, KaplanL, Dietl R, et al. Clinical acceptance and accuracy assessment of spinal implants guided with the SpineAssist surgical robot; retrospective study. Spine.2010;35(24):2109-2115.

  4. Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier, G. Spinal Robotics: Current Applications & Future Perspectives. Neurosurgery. 2013;72:A12-A18.

  5. Barzilay, Schroeder, Hiller, Singer, Hasharoni, Safran, Liebergall, Itshayek, Kaplan. Robotic assisted vertebral body augmentation - a radiation reduction tool. Spine Journal: Volume 39, Number 2, pp 153-157.

  6. Onen, Mehmet Resid, Simsek, Mehmet, Naderi, Sait. Robotic Spine Surgery: A Preliminary Report. Turkish Neurosurgery: Volume 24, Number 4, pp 512-518.